RomeMembers only 7 min ago0Add to bookmarks

Parolin qualifies the consecrations as a schismatic act, Tornielli publishes a meditation on the pain of a tear, Dom Alcuin Reid calls for the preservation of unity. The battle shifts to the faithful.
We last week retraced the latae sententiae excommunications notified by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith after the Écone consecrations of July 1st. The week ends with three convergent Roman signals: Cardinal Parolin publicly qualifies the ordinations as a schismatic act, L'Osservatore Romano publishes this week a meditation by Andrea Tornielli entitled "The Pain of a Tear", and several traditional voices, including Dom Alcuin Reid, call to preserve the concrete unity of the faithful.
Since the unauthorized consecrations of July 1st, the Society of Saint Pius X is in an unprecedented canonical situation: its bishops are excommunicated, its priests and laity, however, are not ipso facto. But the canonical shadow falls on the faithful, who multiply questions about the validity of the sacraments received in the chapels of the Society.
On July 2nd, the day after the consecrations, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, Secretary of State, declared to Infovaticana that the consecrations deeply wound the unity of the Church and constitute a schismatic act. L'Osservatore Romano publishes in the following days the meditation of Andrea Tornielli. On July 6th, Dom Alcuin Reid, in an interview with Infovaticana, exhorts not to confuse the formal schism of the bishops and the sensus fidei of the faithful. In parallel, Le Salon Beige reports that the canonical faculties for marriages and confessions are not expressly revoked at this stage.
The Code of Canon Law, in canon 1364 §1, strikes formal schism with latae sententiae excommunication. But Vatican II, in Unitatis Redintegratio n. 3, teaches that the baptized "cannot be accused of the sin of separation" when they inherit an ecclesiastical state of which they are not the authors. Saint Augustine, against the Donatists, already distinguished the fault of the leaders and the ignorance of the faithful. This distinction imposes on Rome a double clarity: canonical severity on the bishops, pastoral patience on the laity.
The success of the return procedure will depend less on the texts than on the parishes. If the concerned dioceses open places of celebration according to the usus antiquior with a welcoming pastoral care, the wave of returns will be real. Otherwise, the canonical void will produce clandestine chapels.
A blind spot persists: the question of the freedom of the traditional Mass. Without a clear reform of Traditionis Custodes, the return remains theoretical. It is here that the word of Leo XIV is awaited.
Pray for charity and for unity, for the persecuting and persecuted bishops. Do not judge the faithful according to the fault of their pastors.
Create a free account to access all our content and the weekly review.
Article produced by artificial intelligence, reviewed under human editorial control.
FSSPX: Leo XIV issues a final appeal before July 1st