RomeMembers only yesterday3Add to bookmarks

On June 30, 2026, just hours before the episcopal ordinations announced by the Society of Saint Pius X for the following day, Leo XIV addressed a personal letter to its Superior General. **"Turn back!"** – the tone is pleading, but the canonical position is that of Burke: there is no state of necessity.
We had followed step by step the inexorable rise toward this July 1, 2026: the announcement of the episcopal consecrations by the Society of Saint Pius X, the consistory meeting where Cardinal Müller had drawn the canonical line, then the explosive declaration by Cardinal Burke ruling out any "state of necessity." On June 30, Leo XIV played his final card.
On June 30, Leo XIV addressed a personal letter to Bishop Davide Pagliarani, Superior General of the SSPX, calling on him to "renounce the schism" and to "retrace his steps." According to La Croix and Zenit, the text acknowledges the Society’s doctrinal concerns but sets a sine qua non condition for any dialogue: the abandonment of the consecrations scheduled for July 1. The timeline published by Infovaticana reveals that the Vatican had attempted to secure an audience for a year without success; the first official letter was only transmitted twenty-four hours before the planned consecrations. Bishop Viganò immediately reacted on LifeSiteNews: "Leo XIV is only waiting for an opportunity to excommunicate us all"—a statement that does not represent the SSPX (Viganò himself has been excommunicated since 2024) but illustrates the fracture within traditionalist circles.
The canonical framework has been established since 1988. Canon 1382 of the Code of Canon Law provides for latae sententiae excommunication for any bishop who consecrates or is consecrated without a pontifical mandate. Archbishop Lefebvre had invoked the "state of necessity" to justify the 1988 consecrations; John Paul II had described them as "schismatic acts" in the apostolic letter Ecclesia Dei (1988). On June 29, Cardinal Burke formally rejected this argument: "The current situation does not constitute a state of necessity." Without this foundation, any potential consecrations would have no serious theological justification—even within the tradition to which the Society lays claim.
If the consecrations take place, new bishops struck by latae sententiae excommunication will be added to the Society’s history. The faithful attached to it will have to choose between communion in juridical rupture with Rome and the already regularized communities—Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter, Institute of Christ the King, Good Shepherd. Communion is not one option among others: it is the condition of the Church.
The Vatican’s handling leaves an open question: can a letter sent twenty-four hours before the consecrations be anything other than a gesture for history? If Infovaticana’s timeline is accurate, structured dialogue never truly took place. Viganò’s reaction—virulent, isolated, and disqualifying for its author—must not obscure the real question: what will Écône do on July 1, and how will Rome respond the following day?
"Ubi Petrus, ibi Ecclesia"—"Where Peter is, there is the Church" (Saint Ambrose, Explanatio Psalmi XL, 30). Unity is not sentimentality: it is the mark of the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church that we profess in the Creed.
Create a free account to access all our content and the weekly review.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Ma grand-mère disait que l’Église, c’est comme une famille : on peut claquer la porte, mais on reste toujours du même sang. Alors ces sacres, c’est quoi ? Une rupture ou juste un cousin qui fait sa crise ?
Ma tante, tertiaire dominicaine, dit toujours : « L’Église est une mère, pas un notaire. » Mais une mère a aussi des règles, non ?
Ma voisine de la FSSPX me disait hier : « Les sacrements, c’est ce qui compte, pas les papiers. » Et si l’unité commençait par là, dans nos églises ?
FSSPX : Léon XIV lance un dernier appel avant le 1er juillet