**GPA: The French Supreme Court Opens the Door to Recognition of Foreign Parentage**

Ongoing story : Misoprostol seul et Jérôme Lejeune : deux visions de l'homme face à face· Part 8/8

France just now4Add to bookmarks

**GPA: The French Supreme Court Opens the Door to Recognition of Foreign Parentage**
Illustration : Marie Yukimura Saitō

The plenary assembly of July 3, 2026, mandates the recognition of foreign judgments. France prohibits surrogacy in Paris but validates it as soon as it has been carried out in Kyiv or Los Angeles.

The Fact

On July 3, 2026, the Court of Cassation, sitting in plenary session, ruled that France must henceforth fully recognize parentage resulting from surrogacy carried out abroad, provided that a foreign judgment has been issued. This decision removes one of the last legal barriers in French domestic law, which still prohibits surrogacy on its soil under Article 16-7 of the Civil Code.

Our Interpretation (in Light of Magisterial Teaching)

In our previous edition, we had interpreted surrogacy as an undertaking contrary to natural law. Today’s decision does not invent anything new. It completes what the Strasbourg jurisprudence had outlined in the case of Mennesson v. France (ECtHR, June 26, 2014, No. 65192/11). The magisterial teaching is firm. The 1987 instruction Donum Vitae (II, A, 3), followed by Dignitas Personae in 2008 (No. 25), classifies surrogate motherhood among procedures "offensive to the dignity of the human person." The Catechism of the Catholic Church (No. 2378) reminds us that "a child is not something owed to one, but a gift." By legalizing the recognition of parentage resulting from a practice prohibited on its soil, France enshrines a contradiction. It prohibits the commodification of women and children in Paris while validating it when committed in Kyiv, Los Angeles, or Tbilisi. The internal legal boundary becomes a fiction. Surrogate mothers remain invisible in the ruling.

For Reflection

Article 3 of the International Convention on the Rights of the Child states that the best interests of the child must guide all decisions. The Court invokes this. But the child’s best interests cannot erase the moral law that prohibits making a human being the object of a contract. We will pray for the instrumentalized surrogate mothers and for the children born of these contracts, whose mothers of origin are erased by the law today.

Key Points

The Court of Cassation’s decision aligns with the European Court of Human Rights’ jurisprudence but contradicts France’s domestic prohibition of surrogacy.

Article produced by artificial intelligence, reviewed under human editorial control.

Our newsroom
Was this article helpful?

4 people liked this article

Like
Isabelle de FranclieuJuriste, chroniqueuse bioéthique & société
Juriste de formation, elle suit les questions de bioéthique, de famille et de liberté de conscience, dans la perspective du droit naturel.
Share:
Comments (4)

Sign in to join the discussion.

CurioBretagne 04 Jul 2026 · 08:38

Si on reconnaît la filiation étrangère, pourquoi ne pas encadrer la GPA ici plutôt que de laisser le marché s’organiser sans règles ?

sophie.b 04 Jul 2026 · 11:10

Encadrer la GPA en France, oui, mais comment éviter que ça ne devienne un business comme aux États-Unis ?

le_veilleur 04 Jul 2026 · 08:27

Enfin un peu de cohérence, mais est-ce que ça ne revient pas à dire que la loi française n’est qu’une façade pour ceux qui ont les moyens ?

Marie47 04 Jul 2026 · 08:20

Reconnaître ces enfants, c’est juste humain. Mais est-ce qu’on ne risque pas d’encourager des dérives en fermant les yeux sur les conditions à l’étranger ?

Cla1re 04 Jul 2026 · 08:03

C’est bien de reconnaître ces enfants, mais est-ce qu’on ne donne pas un chèque en blanc aux cliniques étrangères qui font du business sur le dos des femmes ?

Topics
Explore
Information